Crossties in the shear calculation of columns

[civilization]

Hello. Are crossties included in the calculation of the shearing of the columns? In a few attempts I made, there was no change in the amount of reinforcement between multiple stirrups and single stirrups. I'm asking this for this reason. We cannot allow double stirrups to be used in simple buildings with one or two floors. we get printouts as a single stirrup, but there are also kippers in these printouts, but in practice, kippers are not used. If the idea takes these crossties into account, we have moved away from the design in practice and what should we do to not take them into account. Thanks in advance.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: CHIROZ CALCULATION

Hello. Are crossties included in the calculation of the shearing of columns? In a few tries I did, there was no change in the amount of reinforcement between multiple stirrups and single stirrups. I'm asking why. We can't allow double stirrups to be used in simple structures with one or two floors in practice. We get printouts as single stirrups, but there are also crossties in these printouts, but crossties are not used in practice. If the idea takes these crossties into account, we are moving away from the design in practice and what should we do to avoid taking them into account. Thank you.

Hello, as stated in TBDY 2018 article 7.3.4.1 and Figure 7.3, crossties are taken into account in the calculation of transverse reinforcement. Also, there are minimum requirements in the regulation between crossties/stirrup arms. Good work

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[civilization]

Re: KIROZ ACCOUNT

Hello. Are crossties included in the calculation of the shearing of the columns? In a few attempts I made, there was no change in the amount of reinforcement between multiple stirrups and single stirrups. I'm asking this for this reason. We cannot allow double stirrups to be used in simple buildings with one or two floors. we get printouts as a single stirrup, but there are also kippers in these printouts, but in practice, kippers are not used. If the idea takes these crossties into account, we have moved away from the design in practice and what should we do to not take them into account. Thanks in advance.

Hello, as stated in TBDY 2018 article 7.3.4.1 and Figure 7.3, crossties are taken into account in the calculation of transverse reinforcement. In addition, there are minimum requirements in the regulation between crossties/stirrup arms. Good work

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Thank you for your reply Mr. Levent, as I mentioned in the first message, we are having a lot of trouble with the application. If the work is unsupervised, the project goes out of the way. We saw that the project we gave was not implemented in many construction sites, and the master was producing according to his mind. we prepare projects according to the master, not almost according to the regulation. We are trying to do something by foreseeing the mold in the hand of the mold maker, where the blacksmith escaped from work. When you make the interval setting for double stirrups from the parameter settings on the beams, it calculates according to a single stirrup, but as far as I understand there is no such possibility in the column. I wish there was an opportunity in the columns.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: ÇİROZ ACCOUNT

Thank you for your reply Mr. Levent, as I mentioned in the first message, we are experiencing a lot of difficulties in implementation. We saw that the project we gave was not implemented and the master was producing according to his mind. We almost prepare the project according to the master, not according to the regulation. We try to do something by foreseeing the mold in the hand of the mold maker, where the blacksmith missed work. When we make the interval setting for the double stirrup from the parameter settings on the beams, it calculates according to a single stirrup, but not in the column As far as I understand, there is no possibility. I wish there was an opportunity for columns.

Hello, You can turn off the "Multiple stirrup design" option in the "Column Properties/Static Reinforced Concrete" tab. However, even if there is no need, TBDY 2018 item 7.3.4.1 and Figure As stated in 7.3, the distance between stirrups/ crossties arms had to be a<=25fi (fi, transverse reinforcement). r. Good work