German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Creating Low Space on Raft?
- Thread starter yldrmanil
- Start date
Technicalman
New Member
I am not sure if it will be in the program, but I think it is not a suitable situation in terms of reinforcement continuity.
It is done exactly as you described. Also, my question is the question you asked. Because it solves each defined raft differently in itself. But I thought of solving the entire raft by 40 cm and solving it by giving a pile to the reinforcement in the low areas. Of course, it is necessary to fix these manually after the analysis. Or you can bring the upper reinforcement to the lower part. Define the upper reinforcement of the lower zone by finishing with a 30cm square and extending it 60 ft."mkrts88":38i4bikk" said:you need to divide the raft into more than 1 area, the region you want to define low will be a separate region on its own, you can adjust the thickness from there, but is such a design correct?
Hello, I'm telling regardless of the software, if the raft is necessary, of course, a thinner foundation area can be made. The important thing is that the section is of sufficient thickness as a result of the stresses and punching forces in the foundation. It's not that extreme. The foundation elements that you define with different thicknesses with ideCAD are analyzed as a single foundation if there is no problem in the foundation network, only their calculations are listed separately in the reinforced concrete dialog, since each is a separate element. The important thing here is that the account axes are not insufficient. If necessary, you must add an additional account axis. In terms of drawing, unfortunately, reinforcement transitions cannot be drawn properly because they are separate elements.
It would be enough. It can also pass through thin foundation.Both are suitable."yldrmanil":m06mljio" said:It is done exactly as you described. But my question is also the one you asked. Because it solves each defined raft differently in itself. However, I thought of solving the entire raft by 40 cm and giving the reinforcement to the reinforcement in low areas. Of course, it is necessary to correct these manually after the analysis. Or is it enough to bring the upper reinforcement to the lower part and finish it with a 30cm square and to define the upper reinforcement of the lower zone by extending it 60 ft. out of the area?
Thank you for your reply. It was useful."MaFiAMaX":1z5vk78n" said:Hi, I'm saying regardless of the software, of course a thinner foundation zone can be made if necessary in the mat foundation. The important thing is that the section is of sufficient thickness as a result of the stresses in the foundation and the punching forces. It is not such an extreme case. ideCAD If there is no problem in the foundation network, the foundation elements that you define with different thicknesses are analyzed as a single foundation, only because each is a separate element, separate calculations are listed in the reinforced concrete dialog. The important thing here is that the calculation axes are not insufficient. If necessary, you should add an additional calculation axis. Drawing Unfortunately, the reinforcement transitions cannot be drawn properly because they are separate elementsSome engineers can also square the upper reinforcement and pass it through the thinner foundation. Both are fine."yldrmanil":1z5vk78n" said:It is done exactly as you described. But my question is the same question you asked. Because it solves each defined raft differently within itself. But it came to my mind to solve the entire radial 40 cm and to solve it by giving a pile to the reinforcement in the low areas. Of course, these need to be corrected manually after analysis. Or is it sufficient to bring the upper reinforcement to the lower part and finish it with a 30cm square and to define the upper reinforcement of the lower zone by extending it 60 ft outside the area?