Compliance of villas with TDY-2007

G

Görkem2007

New Member
Hello, I started to do static models that I had done with many versions of SAP2000 before with ideCAD 6.5 in my new company. I am currently doing a few projects to learn and get to know the program. I am projecting a 2-storey villa (to be used as a residence) to be built in TRNC. Due to architectural requirements, the dimensions of some beams did not comply with TDY-2007. The program reported this problem when I ran the "Geometry Check". For example, due to the roof, a beam to run between 2 columns had to be 25/110 in size. The program warned that in accordance with TDY-2007, the length of the beam should be at most 3.5 times its width. He also wrote that the length of some curtains in the basement must be at least 7 times the width of the curtains. Due to these problems, the program did not allow analysis either. I was able to get the analysis done when I disabled the "conformity check" option from the analysis settings. But having to cancel the eligibility check option is engineering irritating. I also heard that 2-storey villas do not have to comply with TDY-2007. But I want all the structures I project to be as safe as possible. For these reasons, I am curious about the opinions of ideCAD experts and officials. Best regards. Görkem Demircioğlu Nicosia - TRNC
 
Errors encountered in geometry control are generally warnings, and in the case of the 2 errors you mentioned, the program allows analysis and reporting. The control option you turn off is for messages that are usually more serious (insufficiently reinforced elements, incorrect selection of the R coefficient, exceeding the ground safety stress, etc.) listed when receiving the report. Turning off this option is not a very correct method as you have noticed. If you think that there is no problem in your project, you can ignore the errors you get as a result of the geometry control. If the curtains you are talking about are basement curtains, select these curtains and tick the box for basement curtains from their properties, so that the program does not consider your basement curtains in regulation controls (for example, R coefficient and alfas controls).
 
Hello there; Both of the situations you have specified are given as a warning in the geometry control and do not prevent analysis-reinforced concrete in any way. If there is a problem in the analysis, we can say that it is due to a different modeling error. It will be possible to give a clearer answer if you add your project. Best regards.
 
Thank you for your answers. The errors I mentioned do not prevent the analysis as you wrote. I was able to activate the conformity check option and have it analyzed. I must have resolved previous errors that hindered the analysis while working on the model. However, I would like to resolve errors reported in the geometry check whenever possible. I attached a compressed copy of the project to the message. How can I solve the errors (especially those related to TDY) that occur when I "Check Geometry" in this state of the model? Best regards. Gorkem Demircioglu
 
In the geometry control of your project, the beam width can be increased for the warning that -Beam height cannot be more than 3.5 times the beam width (TDY3.4.1.1) on the ground and 1. -Wall length cannot be less than 7 times the wall thickness(TDY 3.6.2.1) warning is for carrier system curtains. This warning does not need to be taken into account in basement perimeter curtains. -one. faulty slab level warning on D108 slab on the floor; The reason is that the slab edge of this slab is attached to the K108 beam at the upper level. If the slab edge is connected to the column as in the example, the problem is solved. -Incorrect floor level warning for the D105 slab on the ground floor; 50 cm elevation has been given to the relevant floor. However, the KZ04 beam to which this slab is attached is not leveled. If the floor is not connected to this beam, a floor edge should be drawn within 1 cm of the beam and the connection of the floor with this beam should be separated. Other project determinations A 50 cm upper level should be given to the S04F column, where KZ08 and KZ31 beams are connected on the ground floor. 50 cm elevation value should be entered in the same column on the next floor. There is a warning that the system cannot be resolved in the analysis. At the junction of the KZ10 -K14 beams on the ground floor, a zero size element is formed. If the relevant beams are entered as in the sample project, analysis can be made in the project.
 
Thank you very much for your recommendations. It was very useful. I wish you good work. Best regards. Görkem Demircioğlu Civil Engineer Nicosia - TRNC
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top