COLUMN IN FLOOR FLOOR

A

[email protected]

New Member
DEAR ID USER AND yetkilierine Annex in which SUN IS'm PROJECT SYSTEM HOLLOW I TO SOLVE (S2) RANGE in the COLUMN (B) distrust the did EXCEED THE GROUND FLOOR 380 CM from NOT IN HEIGHT SYSTEM EXCESS ZORLANIYOR.KAT are COLUMNS ON THE BASIS OF DONATI DIFFERENCE GÖSTERMEKTE.PROJE the İNCELYEREK ABOUT PRACTICE my OVERLOOKED OR right I DO EYES I WOULD LOVE TO GIVE YOU INFORMATION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN NOW. NOTE: FINISH FLOOR THICKNESS IS ESPECIALLY REQUESTED 30CM
 
slab height does not comply with the regulation I do not know how you will get a visa, but I am looking at the project
 
increase the size of the polygon column in the short direction, the problem is solved. I did 35*103 and the problem was fixed. good work.
 
Thank you for your interest, but the slab thickness is not against the regulation and I made the thickness of the polygon column 35 cm, but it does not seem to save in my analysis, if possible, can you add the project you have analyzed
 
Hello, The project is attached. As Mr. İbrahim wrote, when the short dimension of the polygon column on the ground floor is 35 cm, the column saves. Also, the upper and lower floor misalignments of S1 and S11 columns did not match, so I corrected them. (You will get it back if you did it on purpose) Good work
 
Mr. Hakan wishes it easy, first of all, thank you for your interest, but when I open the project you sent back and have it analyzed again, even though the polygon column width is 35 cm, it still gives (b) insecurity, I wonder if there is a problem with my settings. I could not understand if there is a problem with my settings. There was a question about whether you can get a visa about the thickness of the hollow floor slab. As far as I know, there is no defect in the thickness of the project as per the regulation, thanks in advance
 
"[email protected]":2y4h84md" said:
when I open the project you sent back and have it analyzed again, even though the polygon column width is 35 cm, it still gives (b) insecurity, I wonder if there is a problem in my settings.
Click to expand...
Hello, I did the analysis when the eccentricity effects were not checked in the analysis settings. If you have that option checked, it may not be able to save it. It is not required to be marked according to the regulation.
"[email protected]":2y4h84md" said:
A question like can you get a visa about the thickness of the hollow slab As far as I know, there is no defect in the thickness of the project as per the regulation
Click to expand...
Your system seems to be saving as a minimum size. However, for a more precise deflection calculation, you can check the "always check deflection condition" option in the object settings and have the program check deflection even if "height conditions that do not require deflection" are met. As a matter of fact, when the option is selected on the beams, the deflection condition is exceeded in the K201 beam. (Provides height condition regulation) Also, choosing a carrier system is not very good in your project. Maybe you chose it this way out of architectural necessity, but it would be better to make the upper part of the building more suitable, especially as a plan. I find it useful to talk to the architect. It is important to choose a system that fits on the columns as much as possible and is continuous with them, instead of a single beam-stud and beam system with a stud attached to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top