German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish izmirlimuhendis
New Member
If we draw a 175/25 size wall modeled as acceptance as a column, will this cause a change in the calculations or the reinforcement order?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
column-curtain modeling
- Thread starter izmirlimuhendis
- Start date
mhanifiata
New Member
the question is not clearly understood. /175 If you are wondering if there is a difference between defining a vertical element as a wall object and as a column object; If you model it as a 1-panel object and a shell, it will be considered as a wall because it provides 1/7 ratio and the reinforcement arrangement will be accordingly. It behaves like a shell and breaks down to sub-objects and with finite element modeling, load transmission is very smooth. For example, it transmits the moment and axial load to the foundation from many points, which is basically a more positive effect. If you define it with a 2-column object, the center is modeled with a bar. It is equipped with a shear reinforcement arrangement as it provides the ratio of the shear wall. The load bearing system is in the form of a single note bar. Other effects are transferred to this center with a rigid arm. For example, the moment and axial y It transmits the three from a single point, which is basically a more negative effect."izmirlimuhendis":1i0gbvzv" said:If we draw a wall with 175/25 size and modeled as acceptance as a column, will it cause a change in calculations or reinforcement order?
Levent Özpak
New Member
Elements entered with column object in the program are modeled as bars ."sereze":3jkk7cpo" said:I want to model the column as a shell (because one end is on one axis and the other is on the other axis), but I want its reinforcement and verification as a column. Is it possible?