Column, beam sizing!

[Sinan2358]

Good work everyone. I wanted to get information about a problem with a question mark in my mind that I could not find in the program. First, I started to analyze a square-shaped system and sized my columns as 25×30 as per the regulation. But I wanted to reduce the column size and a 25×13 column can be resolved in the system without any errors. My question here is not to discuss the regulation, but I could not find the force that the 25×13 column that I resized can carry in the menus. Is the sizing not calculated because it is out of the regulation? Thank you from now .

 

[Levent Özpak]

Good work everyone. I had a question mark in my mind and wanted to get information about a problem that I could not find in the program. First I started to analyze a square system and I resized my columns as 25×30 as per the regulations. But I wanted to reduce the column size and a 25×13 column can be resolved in the system without any errors.My question here is not to discuss the regulation, but I could not find the force that the 25×13 column I resized the column can carry in the menus.Is the sizing not calculated because it falls outside the regulation? Thank you in advance.[/ quote] Hi, -Rectangular and circular section column dimensions are not met in the geometry control, information is given in the geometry control -In the Column Axial Force Control report, information about the axial load capacities of the column and whether the limit is exceeded according to the conditions of TS 500 and TDY 2007. Good work

 

[Sinan2358]

Thank you very much, Levi. I wonder if I made a mistake here, I created a square plane and connected the four corners to each other with 25x50 beams. I ran the system through the geometry check, then I played with the dimensions of the column. Since I did not check the geometry again, the system did not give an error and when I received the report, I could not analyze the nmax value correctly.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Thank you very much, Mr. Levent. I wonder if I made a mistake here, I created a square plane and connected the four corners with 25x50 beams. I checked the geometry of the system, then I played with the dimensions of the column. Because I didn't check the geometry again The system did not fail and when I received the report, I could not analyze the nmax value correctly.

Geometry control is not directly related to the reports.Also, a column whose dimensions do not meet the regulations can provide Axial load capacity conditions.

 

[Sinan2358]

We cannot size the column according to the calculated nmax value of 5.04 tf. If we try to dimension it, it's a ridiculous size. There should be a 25x0.2 column, but it doesn't work. When we size it, is it the regulation because it gives an error? In fact, you must have understood why I'm asking, the issues that seem unimportant here are the foundation of the building. Understanding and interpreting the foundation and designing more economical buildings. I'm trying to match my own logic with the program.

 

[Levent Özpak]

We can't size the column according to the calculated nmax value of 5.04 tf. If we try to size it, it's an absurd size anyway. There should be a 25x0.2 column, but it doesn't. You understand that I'm asking on purpose. The issues that seem unimportant and not focused on here constitute the foundation of the building. Understanding and interpreting the foundation and designing more economical buildings. I try to match my logic with the program.

Column dimensions must meet the conditions given in both regulations. Error message is given only in geometry check.

 

[Sinan2358]

thank you sir levent