German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish hello friends, the project I added is getting results without any errors. but I see inadequacy in column shear force. 1- How can I get rid of this problem? 2- How can I create rib tile more accurately? 3- Is it better for the pillow beams to go diagonally long, or is it shorter and studded?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Column beam shear force
- Thread starter tasyapı
- Start date
Hi My Suggestions --Make the KO2-KO3 beams 50 cm, --Make the K09-K10 beams 50 cm and connect them to the column from the top, --When the above is done, (B) error does not occur, --D17-D19 and D28 and D29 can be rotated for the ribs, but the loaded It is necessary to check the beams, --Do not do the rib beams diagonally if there is no necessity. Unver ÖZCAN
Thank you very much for your reply sir. I modeled the structure from the beginning and did as you said, but it gives a B error again, this is a healthier solution. Increasing or decreasing the width of the K21 AND K22 beams does not change the solution. Apart from the subject, after making the last update of the ide, the automatic naming is only on the floor we are on. In the previous version, all floors were named as beams. Is there something I overlooked?
Levent Özpak
New Member
Hello, First of all, the basement curtains and raft defined in the first model you added are not defined in the basic second model.(Therefore, the bottom edge of the stairs is left empty and the deformation is incorrect.) Additional suggestions; -Analysis Settings dialog / "Apply TS 500 redistribution item" in the Load Safety Tab -In order to increase the "bj" width in the Joint Cut Safety control, if the architectural design allows, the misalignment of the K02-K03 beams can be adjusted as 5 cm, the misalignment of the K09-K10 beams as 45 cm."tasyapı":t05nme9h" said:unver sir, thank you very much for your answer. I modeled the structure from the beginning and did as you said, but it gives a B error again, this is a healthier solution. Increasing or decreasing the width of the K21 AND K22 beams does not change the solution.
In the "Automatic Naming Options" dialog, the "Name objects on other floors taking into account the objects on the current floor" option may not be selected.Apart from the subject, after the last update of the ide then automatic naming is only on the floor we are on. In the previous version, all floors were named as beams. Is there something I missed?
Mr. Levent, thank you, there is no problem left.Hi, First of all, the basement curtains and raft base defined in the first model you added are not defined in the second model. (For this reason, the bottom edge of the ladder remains free and the deformation is incorrect.) Additional suggestions; - "Apply TS 500 redistribution clause" option can be checked in Analysis Settings dialog/Load Security Tab. -To increase the "bj" width in the Join Interrupt Security control; If the architectural design allows, the misalignment of the K02-K03 beams is 5 cm. The misalignment of the K09-K10 beams is 45 cm. It can be edited as defined.
thank you for your interest, Mr. UnverHello I have corrected your first model, please use it in the attachment.