Circular Section Structure Cassette Slab Identification

[kadirbulut2012]

I want to define a cassette for the attached project, but somehow I couldn't. Typical beam determination part turned into a complete puzzle/maze. If I ensure the continuity of one, on the other hand, I cannot.

 

[kadirbulut2012]

note: by the way, the small curtains on the floor above the ground floor were accidentally copied to the upper floor. Please do not take it into consideration. The issue is not correcting the system, but the method of defining a tape for this type of structure and showing the typical beams.

 

[2m proje]

Hello there; Placement can be done as you do, however, it is beneficial to place your cassette molds optimally according to the mold sizes you have, such as 1/1 - 1/2, while placing the cassette. Attached, I am sharing the drawing I prepared as a suggestion. It will be a more suitable solution if you determine the dimensions of the main beams in and around the floor according to the placement and height of the cassette formwork. Also, I think 20cm plate thickness is too much for cassette flooring. Best regards.

 

[NYILMAZ]

Let this be me. It seems like that's what I would do. I would also choose the typical beams as in the picture. NY

 

[kadirbulut2012]

Hi; You can place the cassette as you do, however, it is useful to place your cassette molds optimally according to the mold sizes you have, such as 1/1 - 1/2 when placing the cassette. I am sharing the drawing I prepared as a suggestion in the attachment. It will be a more suitable solution if you determine the dimensions of the main beams inside and around it according to the placement and height of the cassette molds. Also, I think 20cm plate thickness is too much for cassette flooring. Regards.

thank you for your answer, the thickness of such things like plaque etc. is random I just tried to explain that I couldn't choose the typical beams. I haven't started beam-column-floor section and dimensioning yet. Because the project was normally a plate, a few changes were requested later, the column was removed, added, etc. I got errors while I was converting it to a test cassette and positioning the typical beams. " probably like beam discontinuity.." Regards, thanks again cures.

This is mine too. It seems like I would do it. I would choose typical beams as in the picture. NY

Dear nyılmaz, I applied it as you did in the picture, but I get the same error. Don't you get an error or are our techniques different. Which elements did you choose to direct the tapes in this way?

 

[NYILMAZ]

Are you selecting typical beams with the Define typical beam command? Thus, it is defined. It does not give insufficient typical beam error. Continuity is not always something that can be fixed. Depending on the placement of the beams, the continuity may not coincide. When I did it myself, I obviously tried to create the continuity, but I didn't look at the geometry control. I closed the project without saving it. That's why I couldn't do it again. Because I used upright references and stuff there. I didn't dare to do it again, the truth is

 

[kadirbulut2012]

Do you select typical beams with the define typical beam command? This way they are defined. It does not give insufficient typical beam error. Continuity is not always something that can be fixed. Continuity may not coincide depending on the placement of beams. When I do it myself, obviously continuity I tried to create it but I didn't look at the geometry control. I closed the project without saving it too. So I couldn't do it again. Because I used perpendicular references there, etc. I didn't mind doing it again. The truth is

yes I'm doing exactly that. It's the first time I'm working on tape-rib, but this is I'm probably getting a typical beam continuity error in the geometry check. Is this a negligible error?

 

[NYILMAZ]

As for how I did it: Based on the beams parallel to the outer frame. (K153-160 etc. beams) I made the ribs perpendicular and parallel to them. Afterwards, I tried to create continuity by selecting the ribs with a typical rib determination. Continuities form towards the centre. But I did not check the geometry whether it occurs on the adjacent slab or not. N. YILMAZ

 

[NYILMAZ]

yes i am doing exactly this first time i am not working cassette-rib but this is probably typical i get beam continuity error in geometry check.is this a negligible error? i did continuity with a solution close to what you did but continuity error

You can ignore it if you do it consciously.

 

[kadirbulut2012]

It seems to me that I will encounter big errors in the outputs I will receive. attached is the error i got

 

[HakanŞahin]

I feel like I will encounter big errors in the outputs I will receive.

There are two classes in the geometry control. Error or warning. The message in the screenshot you attached is warning, error not . The program says "there is such a case, please check it out". If the data entry you entered is suitable for your purpose, and the data entries suggested to you seem appropriate, you can ignore this warning.

 

[kadirbulut2012]

I seem to encounter big errors in the outputs I will receive.

There are two classes in geometry control. Error or warning. The message in the screenshot you attached is warning, not error . The program says "review there is such a case". If the data entry you entered is suitable for your purpose, and the suggested data entries seem appropriate, you may ignore this warning.

Although I have used the error/warning distinction all this time or because I have always perceived it as an "error", I did not pay attention. thank you.