cassette flooring

saridurmus

New Member
Since the opening is large instead of one-way hollow floor slabs in hollow pierced structures, the slab thickness is insufficient when I make it as a cassette for double-sided hollow slabs. For example, it says that the cross section is insufficient even for a 5.5 m long slab. even when we increase the thickness of the slab by 10 cm, it says the section is insufficient. what is the reason?
 
"saridurmus":3gnk9pbz" said:
The thickness of the slab is insufficient when I make it as a cassette for double sided hollow slabs, because the opening is large instead of one-way hollow slab in hollow tiling structures. For example, it says the slab thickness is insufficient even for a 5.5 m long slab. Even when we remove it, it says the cross section is insufficient. I wonder what is the reason?
Hello, it is a normal situation for now, the program looks at the distance between two teeth in the other direction. Either you will not take this message into account even though the program gives an error, or you can define a rib in one direction and define the transverse tooth yourself. you will define... Take it easy...
 
"saridurmus":29nvn4sw" said:
the thickness of the slab is insufficient when I make it as a cassette for double sided hollow block slabs since the opening is large instead of one-way hollow slab in hollow slab structures. For example, it says the cross section is insufficient even for a 5.5 m long slab. It says the slab thickness is 10 cm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Even when we remove it, it says the section is insufficient. What is the reason?
In the new version, you will be able to enter your ribs like this. The program will behave appropriately...
 
How can we define a rib in one direction and define a transverse tooth ourselves? Also, I did not see such a problem in 6.0053, it is not in this version, is it? thanks
 
You enter the unidirectional rib and do the calculation, and you complete the transverse rib beam on that slab with the same reinforcement in the drawing. You are doing this in the same v6.0053.
 
Hakan, when we enter it as a transverse tooth i cassette, the floor cross section is insufficient. At least that's how it is at 6.0053.
 
yes, I checked, it does not give an error message when we specify it as transverse female cassette flooring in flooring. This issue has not been fixed. thanks.
 
Back
Top