Carrier System Selection and Balcony Distance !

M

mehmet sesigüzel

New Member
Hello to all forum users; I would love it if my experienced brothers and colleagues could comment on the photos. Firstly; 1-) Are there abnormal parts in the vertical carrier system selection and curtain placement? 2-) I solved the balcony as a hollow block (32'), the municipality allows such solutions, but isn't the distance too much? What is the most logical solution other than this choice on the balcony, can I get your creative ideas? Earthquake zone: A total of 13 floors with 3 2 basements.
 
Hello, my advice is; 1) In this system, it can be done in the hollow block, but if I were you, I would lay slabs and turn the remaining floor with deep beams and run console. 2) If a hollow block is to be made, I think it is most reasonable to carry the teeth to the curtain and make it deep in the 40/32 beam. It is more appropriate for me to put the rib beam on the console side at the outermost part. 3) Linear load definition is not taken into account in hollow slabs. Instead, it may be a solution to do as I said and define a rib beam under the wall and increase the slab live load. 4) Band beams are constructive elements. Best regards.
 
With the architect, extend the console until it is flush with the curtain on the I axis and close the beam around the console, and go to the solution.
 
"saridurmus":3fkzqhr1" said:
Extend the console until it is level with the curtain on the I axis of view with the architect and close the console with the beam and go to the solution in this way.
Click to expand...
"mehmet sesgüzel":3fkzqhr1" said:
2)If If a hollow block is to be made, I think it is most reasonable to move the teeth to the curtain and to make it deep in 40/32 beams. It is more appropriate for me to put the rib beam on the outermost part on the console side.
Click to expand...
I get an error when I define the tooth directions of two floors differently in the photo. Is it wrong to solve in this way? What do I need to do to be able to turn with a (15/32) tooth like a normal rib tooth in the part I marked? I was trying to find out if it can be entered like a cassette flooring, unfortunately I could not find it, I would be very happy if you could help with the correct data entry. In this photo, I covered the long side of the console with a rib beam, but how can I close the open short side? I would like to thank my friends who can help. Best regards.
 
1-My preference would be to lay a thick slab on the condition of being able to turn it with deep beams. However, if threaded flooring is to be made, my advice is to install the D15 and D12 floorings in the same direction as the continuation of the cantilevered floorings. Because we don't like discontinuous gear tiles defined on consoles. However, in this case, you will have an additional load on the inserted beams and this will force the beams into which these beams are inserted. At the same time, I do not prefer to use different flooring systems on the same floor unless it is necessary. Especially if a solution is to be made by accepting a rigid diaphragm. The choice is yours... 2-You have chosen a mixed system. Considering the column-wall densities, high ductile curtains in both directions seem to meet the alphas> 0.40 condition. In this case, the bulkheads undertake the task of carrying horizontal loads. What I mean by explaining this is that there are no frameworks in your system. If we take the system in general, I think that you should at least provide continuity in the axles where the curtains are in order for your curtains to be included in the system. Otherwise, D=15 cm slabs connected to the walls rather than beams will undertake the task of transmitting the earthquake load between vertical carriers. Serious effects may occur in the areas where the floors are supported on the curtains... I hope you accept a semi-rigid diaphragm... 3-You have studs close to the column, do the studs and studs with studs have the same dimensions? 4-probably because it is a wall, you used tape beams. However, since these beams are not supported on the column, I think they are unnecessary. As it stands, there is no benefit to the system. Even when they are supported on the remaining column, their benefits are discussed. Instead, I recommend thickening the tiles locally. In this way, you will benefit from the situation I mentioned in the 2nd article... If there are wrong ones among my preferences, please correct them.. Good work....
 
By thick floor I meant no more than 15 cm. We already want the beams to carry the console by turning it with beams, for this purpose, there is no need to make the floor thicker and make the console heavier. I realized that after re-reading the post. I don't want to mislead. By the way, what solution did you implement for the console? Good work...
 
I already understood that it is 15 cm, but when I was going to solve these balconies with a hollow floor system, I already created two types. In both, I wanted to make the part surrounded by beams as a ribbed open console part as if it were a cassette, but in one I made the K50 beam as long as 55 cm and in the other one surrounded by ribs. Which system do you think would be more suitable? can i have your opinion? If you have a different solution, I would be very pleased if you would specify them for the hollow block system, for example 35 cm deep instead of 32, rib directions etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top