Carrier System Selection and İdecad

lilahmiharbi

lilahmiharbi

New Member
Hello guys, the thing I want to ask is this. The heart wishes that we can always create the most healthy carrier system, that the columns form a frame with beams, not reinforcement beams. However, due to the architectural demands of the customer, many times the carrier system is not healthy solutions may emerge. Can we build projects that do not fail as a result of idecad analysis, even if the carrier system is not healthy?
 
WITH WHICH PROGRAM YOU SOLVE IT, WE CANNOT BUILD IT, EVEN IF THE SOLUTION DOES NOT GIVE AN ERRORS. The building doesn't behave the way you want it to. You must model it by predicting how the building will behave. The civil engineer who calculates the building should have knowledge of what the program (LOGIC) does and building behavior. Otherwise, he will put the ladder on the rib, without regulating the support conditions, without activating the semi-rigid diaphragm and the option to consider in the calculation, he thinks that he has taken into account the loads and moments of the ladder, the result will be incomplete and wrong. While the building is being built, the stairs are destroyed or there are undesired cracks and destructions in the earthquake. (Example project
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
) Ünver ÖZCAN
 
I think the following concise words give the most correct answer to your question; Structural Engineering is the art of constructing real structures that can only be analyzed approximately, using materials whose properties can only be predicted, under the influence of undetermined loads. Numerical results are obtained from the analysis. Ignorant engineers forget the assumptions made and think that the numbers are real and believe that these are the solution to the problem.
 
Hello, For this kind of question; I think that the search for answers such as "Of course you can" (for the purpose of reassurance) and the "need for more trust in programs" stem from the engineer's lack of self-confidence and knowledge. As the person becomes more informed, the level of engineering increases and he gains self-confidence, this need gradually decreases... The ENGINEER, not the PROGRAM engineer, should manage the program. (It's a well-known word.) Good work. KEMAL YALVAC
 
Hello, In my last article, I tried to explain only the starting point of such questions in my own way. I don't want to cause misunderstanding. Of course, you will trust the programs, which you already have to at some point. However, some points are engineer-oriented, such as "Building the carrier system". It is necessary to pay attention to this. We sometimes see examples in the forum, such as discontinuous and weak frame systems in which the earthquake load is completely assumed by the frame system, or "broken shears", which are assumed by the shears but are not included in the system. It's a very fine line. Sometimes it can be very difficult to answer such questions. You are the driver. no matter how good your vehicle is, you must be a good driver... Good work. KEMAL YALVAC
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top