CAN THE FIRST PROJECT BE EXAMINED WITH ITS GENERAL LINES?

[serkan zorlu]

HELLO, I HAD A LOT OF DIFFICULTIES BECAUSE IT WAS MY FIRST PROJECT, CAN YOU REVIEW WITH ITS GENERAL LINES? BECAUSE THE ELEVATOR CURTAINS DID FAULT ON THE BASEMENT FLOOR, I UPGRADED THE SIZE TO 30 CM ON THE OTHER FLOORS.. CAN'T THIS PROBLEM BE SOLVED OTHERWISE? I HOPE TO GO THROUGH THESE DIFFICULT DAYS WITH YOUR HELP.

 

[YasinTezel]

HELLO I HAD A LOT OF DIFFICULTIES BECAUSE IT WAS MY FIRST PROJECT, CAN YOU REVIEW WITH ITS GENERAL LINES? ELEVATOR CURTAINS FAILURE ON THE BASEMENT FLOOR. I HIGHLY UPGRADED ITS SIZE TO 30 CM EVEN AGAIN... .. I TRIED TO SOLVE IT CONTINUOUSLY I DIDN'T BUILD THE ELEVATOR WELL, CAN YOU HELP ME HOPE TO GO THROUGH THESE DIFFICULT DAYS WITH YOUR HELP? In addition, it would be appropriate to connect the columns with beams in the X direction. As a suggestion, increase the raft foundation ampatage size. Concrete class is C25 instead of C20, Foundation thickness is 60 cm instead of 40, Use earthquake loads in the raft foundation soil stress control was passive. It was active. Superstructure interactive the solution has been activated Automatic object naming has been done. you can eliminate.

 

[serkan zorlu]

First of all, thank you very much Mr. Yasin.. May Allah be pleased with you and increase your knowledge. Is the point solving properly.. I mean, does it matter if the axles are on the same axis? It doesn't define the automatic junction areas when it's on the same axis.. I'm sorry, as I said, it's my first project.. thank you very much again, with my respects...

 

[YasinTezel]

First of all, thank you very much Mr. Yasin.. May Allah be pleased with you and increase your knowledge... I will do what you say, but "You only connected the cantilever beams with beams on the cantilevered facades. "I couldn't understand this part exactly, should I give the joint point from different places ... Is idecad static joint point decoding properly.. So does the axes matter, does it not automatically define the joint regions when it is on the same axis? I'm sorry, as I mentioned, my first project.. Thank you very much again...

It would be more appropriate to connect the Columns with beams in the X direction in the area inside the red rectangle in the picture above. You just passed a beam through the end of the console.

 

[serkan zorlu]

Mr. Yasin, I understand, thank you very much.. I have one more question: when I make the short size of the elevator curtains 25, it gives a cutting safety error. Can this be fixed only by enlarging the dimensions ... will it be a problem if I just change the relevant size on the wrong floor and increase it (5 cm) ... good studies..

 

[Levent Özpak]

HI HELLO I HAD A LOT OF DIFFICULTIES BECAUSE IT WAS MY FIRST PROJECT, CAN YOU REVIEW WITH ITS GENERAL LINES? AS THE ELEVATOR CURTAINS FAIL ON THE BASEMENT FLOOR, THE SIZE WAS UPGRADED BY 30 CM EVEN BUT THE PROJECT WAS HIGHER... .. I TRIED TO SOLVE IT CONTINUOUSLY I DIDN'T BUILD THE ELEVATOR WELL, CAN YOU HELP ME HOPE TO GO THROUGH THESE DIFFICULT DAYS WITH YOUR HELP WITH YOUR HELP, REGARDS, the coordinates of the elevator floors on the ground floors and in the basement of the project, and the coordinates of each other. Hello

As an alternative to what Yasin Bey said, the analysis option -Semi-rigid diaphragm- can be used in *Analysis Settings/General Settings Tab to solve the curtains according to 25 cm thickness. (In this case, at least 8gb ram in the computer Otherwise, the analysis may not be completed.) *In the Analysis settings / TDY Options Tab -Select ductile materials. Consider unchecking the jit apply to basement- line. * Considering that the panels in size 25/80 will work like a curtain head, I think it would be appropriate to use 14 diameters of longitudinal reinforcement. *K32 beams are defined by giving a single name among AK axles. It would be more appropriate to define the beam with different names between K31-K34, K34-K35, K35-K33 in terms of moment graph. The moment graph of the beams can be examined in the perspective window from the 3d frame mode. (The same is the case for the K37 beam). Analysis was carried out according to the above-mentioned recommendations. And the raft thickness was set to 50 cm. Good work

 

[mhanifiata]

Hello. The continuity of the reinforced concrete frame system may be requested during the project control stages. You only connected cantilever beams with beams on cantilever façades. It is also convenient to connect the columns with beams in the X direction. As a suggestion, increase the raft base ampatage size. The concrete class was C25 instead of C20, the foundation thickness was 60 cm instead of 40, and the raft foundation was passive. It has been active. The superstructure interactive solution has been activated. Automatic object naming has been made. You can examine the attached project.[/quote] I wish it was possible to connect beams in that direction, Mr. Yasin. they stay in the circle from the top of the floor where the climb starts.