Can it be operated as a cantilever slab instead of a beam

M

myb63

New Member
DUE TO ARCHITECTURAL REASONS, K1231 BEAM IS DEFINED AS A CONSOLE BEAM (CONTINUOUS)... THE DIFFERENCE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN THE PICTURE..A) CAN IT BE DESIGNED IN THIS WAY? B) CAN IT BE WORKED AS A CONSOLE FLOOR IN PLACE OF A BEAM? NOTE: WE CANNOT MAKE A CHANGE BECAUSE OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AREA. (CONSOLE LENGTH IS 155 CM) THE BUILDING IS 10 FLOOR AND IS IN THE 3rd DEGREE EARTHQUAKE AREA... C) WHERE DO WE LOOK AT THE FINISHED VALUE FOR K1231 BEAM, FROM K1231 BAR FROM KASRE. 30 CM WAS MADE) D) WHAT OTHER MEASURES SHOULD BE TAKEN IF IT IS DESIGNED IN THIS WAY?
 
I do not see any harm in installing console flooring. In fact, I would say that it would be better to lay cantilevers rather than build a cantilever from a beam.
 
In order not to encounter the deflection problem, I designed a beamed console..is it an ideal solution if it stays like this..?thanks..
 
I designed a beamed console to avoid deflection problems..is it ideal if it stays that way?..thanks..
 
I designed it with a cantilever beam due to the length of the cantilever. It was approved in this way.. will it be healthy if it stays like this?
 
"myb63":1ckd7hyd" said:
I designed it with a cantilever beam due to the length of the console. It was approved in this way..is it healthy if it stays like this?
Click to expand...
 
It's not a console big enough to be a problem. Both solutions are suitable. But the architectural preference comes to the fore here. I wrote my choice. If there will be a console from a single point curtain (in the vertical direction), I prefer to console the floor in a spread way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top