Beamless slab flooring

Hello My Suggestions --The curtains are one-way, put a curtain on the other side enough to be sufficient. --1.There is no curtain outside on the basement floor. Remove the check in the floor general settings, --Remove the DS on the floors, --Enter the staircase and elevator shaft and the foundation and have an analysis done. Unver ÖZCAN
 
Unver, when we make curtains in half of the basement floor, I constantly get errors that it does not save thickness on the floors. I encounter this situation when un-beamed floors are attached to the curtains.
 
In this type of flooring, you should check the reinforced concrete calculation axles. The program defines automatic reinforced concrete calculation axis type depending on the structure of the flooring. Although it should not be console flooring, it acts as console flooring. Or the reinforcement type can be flat piye or otherwise. However, what you want is the beamless floor reinforcement type. In this case, it makes a thickness query as a program depending on the reinforcement type. Then you get a warning of insufficient thickness. For example, in your project, the calculation axis no. 8 on the D174 floor in the 1st basement was intended to be operated from the P37 curtain as if it were a console. At that time, the program considers the 19.25 m console as a slab, and therefore finds the thickness insufficient. What needs to be done: With the reinforced concrete calculation axis edit command 1- Decide how the slab works and edit it accordingly 2- Write the required clearance value for thickness control and tick the box. Check this out for other account axes as well. Choose flat reinforcement at the bottom and the top. N. YILMAZ
 
hello, I created account axles on my beamless slab. Since I have curtains, some of my account axes appear as consoles. I will fix them, but I did not know which working type to choose.
 
Check the option of flat reinforcement at the top and bottom. Decide according to the geometry of the tile (taking into account the aspect ratio) as the mode of operation. (long or short direction). I don't find it right to enter one-way in tiling without beams. Because the earthquake loads will be transferred by the floors and there is no trapezoidal, triangular and evenly distributed load transfer to the beams, it would be wrong to take one direction.
 
Hello, if a part of the beamless slab is the balcony slab, do you define the live load as a linear live load in that part? Sent via iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thanks. So, how should the band beam requirement be determined for load transfer between columns in beamless flooring? Sent via iPhone using Tapatalk
 
"cagan":243gi44v" said:
So, how should the band beam requirement be determined for load transfer between columns in beamless flooring?
"yunussacikk":243gi44v" said:
nobody recommends tape beams. Load transfer on beamless slab with slab
As of ideCAD v7, slab analysis can be done by including semi-rigid diaphragm, i.e. slab as a structural element, into the analysis model. In this case, there is no need to make a cork (fixed) beam for horizontal and vertical load transfer from the floor to the columns and walls. The need for mushroom beam identification is a necessary condition for other software on the market that cannot provide a semi-rigid diaphragm solution (they added it in v14 but I didn't use it). Even if you define band (mushroom) beam in ideCAD, it is not included in the analysis model and therefore no reinforcement design is made, it only gives a drawing. Indeed, that is it. Question: What is the tape beam used for in ideCAD? Answer: There may be a need for additional sub-reinforcement between column axes in non-beamed slabs (cork floors). It may be necessary to wrap these additional reinforcements with stirrups to increase the shear strength of the flooring. In this case, if you use the band beam and enter the reinforcement you need from the property window, you will get the drawing automatically.
 
Back
Top