beam reinforcements

[bektas]

*I delete the additional reinforcements of the ground floor k6 beam from the reinforced concrete-beam-beams tab. When I click on the beam name from the reinforced concrete configuration, the change I made in the beam reinforcements is not processed. Beam reinforcements appear to be added as before. Also, the reinforcements that I deleted in the reinforcement fields tab are not processed. *k5 and k6 beams are continuous. In the reinforced concrete -beam tab, when k5 beam is selected, when I change the top right or bottom right reinforcement from the reinforced concrete configuration, the addition in the k6 beam does not change automatically. It stays in its old state, which causes the reinforcement areas to be incorrect. *I didn't send the file, you can see it with a simple beam modeling. Reinforced Concrete - Beam tab is not working properly.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hello, I think you are talking about replacing the additional reinforcements in the common support of two beams that are always two. When arranging the beam additional reinforcements, it is necessary to intervene in the reinforcements of the two beams that have a common support. For example, the right support of the K5 beam and the left support of the K6 beam are the common support. If you have changed the upper right addition of the K5 beam here, the upper left addition of the K6 beam must also be changed. Here is the working principle. Good work

 

[bektas]

No, Mr. Levent, I sent the project to you, but I did not receive a response for almost 2 weeks. The tabs in the reinforced concrete - beam menu work incompatible with each other. There was the same problem in the previous version, we talked to you a few days later, the update came and the problem disappeared. What I mean is that; Although it seems that the additional reinforcement has been deleted from the reinforced concrete configuration, it is adding that reinforcement in the reinforcement fields tab as if it has not been deleted. Every time I change the reinforcement, I also need to check it from the reinforcement fields. I have one more question *structure; 1.100 square meters and b+z+3 floors floor class z4 safety stress 10. I am making 50 cm raft foundation here, it saves safety coefficient 1.4, I examine from reports max. the ground safety stress is 12. as you increase the thickness, max. emn. is increasing. I think 80-90 cm foundation would be appropriate in this type of building. but it seemed a little strange to me that the program saved at 50 cm. Is there any place I need to examine other than the max safety stress * In a 5-storey building, I put columns and curtains for the porch at the basement and ground floor (does not go up to the last three floors). Should I mark these elements as not continuing upstairs?

 

[Levent Özpak]

No, Mr. Levent, I sent the project to you, but I haven't received a response for almost 2 weeks

If your e-mail has reached us, we will definitely reply. If you have not received a reply within 1-2 days regarding the e-mail you sent, you can contact us by voice to find out if your e-mail has been received

We talked to you about the same problem in the previous version, and the update came a few days later and the problem disappeared. What I mean is that; Although it seems that additional reinforcement has been deleted from the reinforced concrete configuration, it is adding that reinforcement as if it has not been deleted in the reinforcement fields tab

In the project I added in the previous message, the current reinforcement area appears 12.44 cm in the reinforcement fields tab on the upper left support of the K5 beam. Now, let's change the upper left addition of the K5 beam and the upper right addition of the K6 beam, for example, let's make 3fi12 and click the Reinforced Concrete button. Now the available reinforcement area is 14.7 cm. So there is no problem here. If you encounter a situation different from the example given above in your project, you can add your project. Or you can send it by e-mail and you can communicate with us by voice.

I have one more question *structure ; 1.100 square meters and b+z+3 floors floor class z4 safety stress 10. I am making 50 cm raft foundation here, it saves safety coefficient 1.4, I examine from reports max. the ground safety stress is 12. as you increase the thickness, max. emn. is increasing. I think 80-90 cm foundation would be appropriate in this type of building. but it seemed a little strange to me that the program saved at 50 cm. Other than the max safety stress, is there somewhere I should examine

Earthquake loadings may not have been used in the control of soil stresses. Please add your project for detailed information.

In a 5-storey building, I put columns and curtains for the porch at the basement and ground floor (does not go up to the last three floors). Should I mark these elements as not continuing on the upper floor

if the panel objects do not continue on the upper floor and if the floor where the panels are located is not rigid -flooded/panel line that does not continue on all floors- line should be marked. Good work