Beam Load Information

O

onda

New Member
In the beam load information section of the reports, the types of loads acting on the beams are shown with 3 different numbers. However, the individual loads coming from the stud beams and defined with the number 2 do not appear at all in the printouts. In order to avoid confusion, I think that single loads of type 2 should be written in the reports. I wish you good work..
 
Hello, -The load indicated by number 2 in the beam loads report is not the stud load on the beam, but the load defined by the user on the beam. -The interaction of beam-to-beam intersections should be evaluated in terms of solution methods of 3D systems in the program. Loosening the studded beam and giving the stud load to the bearing beam is only an approximate method followed in 2D analysis. In this context, no approximate models are used in the program. Because true three-dimensional analysis is done, there is only one frame in the system. It is the building itself, and the beam-beam junctions are also included in this frame. As a result of the analysis, the end forces of each node point are calculated at once. Since beam-beam connections are a nodal point, only nodal balance can be mentioned in such connections. Therefore, an expression like stud load cannot be used in ideCAD Static. There is no such load, the balance of that point in terms of extreme forces is in question. Good work
 
Hello there; In the program, the section effects are calculated with the finite element method, so as you mentioned, there is never a single load transfer to the beam in the bearing position due to the stud beams. The single load case you mentioned is a method used by programs that cannot use the finite element method. There is no error in the notation in the program's reports. Load type 2 has been added to the beams to show the individual loads defined by the users. Best regards.
 
Hello, In the analysis, the beam that we define as the pierced and the beam that we define as the bearer are solved at once and together. In the 3D solution, there is no definition of a stuck-bearing beam. For this reason, the effect that we can call the load of the inserted beam is the end shear force of the beam, which we have already defined as the inserted beam. You can also see the shear forces of the beams in the beam report, under the heading "beam information and static results", with the name of the beam as Vshear. The effects you call stud beam load are actually those effects... Good work..
 
Thank you all for the explanations. The single load definition in the reports is perceived as the shear force transmission of the transported beam. I wish you good work.
 
I would like to thank the related friends at ideYapı for the correction made in version 6.53.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top