German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish have a nice day. I am using ide version 6.053. when I inspect the deflection controls. When checking the deflection of the inner beams, some beams are edge spanned. I noticed that some beams on the outside were also solved as internal openings. It also solves some beams with studs on both sides as simple beams. In other words, when checking the deflection of the beam on the inside, it calculates 1/12 instead of 1/15 as side opening. Does anyone have knowledge on this subject?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
BEAM DIFFERENCE AND CRACK CONTROLS
- Thread starter emrebagdu
- Start date
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Look at that beam, can you add a sample project with explanations that it received this way, but it should receive it like this?
I am attaching the project. The project was looked at in the municipality and it was returned to me with errors exactly like this. I am sending you the same errors as I wrote. I wonder if the problem is in the program, me or the municipality. Thank you in advance. good work. 1-K302 beam is supposed to be side span beam, but the system has detected it as internal opening, while it should be ln/12, it is divided by ln/15 2-K304 beam should be internal opening beam, while the system should be edge span beam as solved. 3-He took the beams K305 and K306 as simple supports. 4-K308,K202,K205 has perceived as an interior opening. 5-K104,106,115,116 edge is detected as aperture...
HakanŞahin
Administrator
I didn't see a problem in the example you showed. I think the concept of edge clearance and internal clearance have been misunderstood by the municipal inspector. By marginal span, it is not that the beam is located at the edge of the structure, but that the beam is a continuous system 1. or it is meant to be in the last opening . In single span systems, the only beam supported on the columns is the side span. The same for the interior span: The interior span is not meant to be inside the structure, but to a continuous girder system 1. or in the last opening is meant. There does not appear to be a problem for the K305 and K306 beams, which are perceived as simple supports. We can define the beams supported by the beam from both sides in the definition of simple support. When you give this information to the authorized person, I think your project will be accepted. Good work..