basically negative strain problem emergency help

O

o_berdibek

New Member
hello friends, there is basically a negative tension problem in my project, I saved the system, but it seems like I am making a mistake somewhere, please help
 
"o_berdibek":k5gesuym" said:
I wanted to add the project as a rar file, but I couldn't upload it due to its large size, what can I do
Click to expand...
You can upload your project to one of the file sharing sites and then give the link.
 
"o_berdibek":39be02hi" said:
hello friends, there is a fundamental negative stress problem in my project, I saved the system, but it seems like I am making a mistake somewhere, please help
Click to expand...
It may not always be possible to recover the negative ground stress due to the earthquake +/- combination. (The x-direction of the structure is quite narrow compared to the y-direction.) In your project, the maximum ground tension was 27.07 t/m2, while the negative tension was around -4.09 t/m2.
 
It was said that there would be changes in the amount of additional reinforcement when the calculation axes were changed. but when the calculation axis is changed in the project, there is no change in the additional reinforcement, why?
 
"o_berdibek":yve5u8sx" said:
it was said that there will be changes in the amount of additional reinforcement when the calculation axes are relocated, but in the project, there is no change in the additional reinforcement when the calculation axis is moved, why?
Click to expand...
for the additional reinforcements to change, the main reinforcements must be changed when the calculation axis is changed In your project, the minimum margins meet the reinforcement requirement at the point where the calculation axis no. 1 passes. The minimum marginsage does not meet the calculation reinforcement at the point where the calculation axis no. 2. Move the calculation axis no. 2 to the right so that it does not overlap the columns and walls as in the example project. In this case, the axis will operate at minimum. You will see that the equipment has also changed.
 
yes, it's already changing. that's what I'm talking about
Click to expand...
I guess we didn't understand what you were talking about. Can you explain your question with a concrete example? If necessary, you can also establish voice communication.
 
In the project I uploaded, the bottom flat @18/14 appears on the account axis no. 2, but when the axis no. 2 is moved to the left, the lower flat @16/15 appears, but there is no change in the additions.
 
Re: semi-rigid diaphragm have a nice day. I solved the project I added with a rigid diaphragm, it did not give an error, but when it is solved with a semi-rigid diaphragm, the ground safety stress does not recover, it gives an error of section insufficiency in a beam. The project solved according to the rigid diaphragm will be used, what should I do?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top