Basic rebar range

T

tedarmi

New Member
1) Although I reduced the additional reinforcement interval for flooring from the reinforcement parameters, after the analysis we discard the old intervals and we cannot fix it 2) I could not fix the raft foundation problem... we can get ideas from our colleagues for this
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
We changed the system because the quantity in cassette slabs is too high. In the s06 and s10 columns, the punching error can be saved by reducing the thickness of the reed to 140 cm. .zip.html]http://s6.file.tc/server6/gjdf2j/concrete..zip.html[/url]
 
I could not understand the 1.4 ton/m2 live load. What will the building be used for? Does the same purpose apply to the roof? Does it also apply to the top of the stair tower? A large part of your problem stems from this load analysis. I can't comment because I don't know. If you will continue to use the same loads, I tried a basic system as in the attached picture. I used continuous foundations and a raft system connected by continuous wires. The raft thickness was 60 cm and the foundation thickness was 100 cm. It can fall more if it is worked on. No problem appears. It will be more economical if you reduce the diameters of raft flooring and continuous foundation beam reinforcements. I've always tried a solution as a foundation as well. It doesn't save 1-2 foundation beams with 200/100 size foundation. Economic methods can also be found to find a solution if worked on. But I'm still stuck with the load. Will the load in question affect the building at any time? Wouldn't you consider applying the live load reduction agent? Good work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top