My suggestion: Calculate the beam piece under the balcony slab and the wall/concrete load above it and give it as a linear load on the balcony end. Make a static calculation and draw it. Correct the drawing and add the parapet reinforcement as below. Unver OZCAN"201968":wauwt97h" said:If we define and calculate the elements of 20/30 dimensions, which are called motifs in the architectural project at the ends of the balcony, as 20/30 beams and not meet the minimum requirement, Would I be doing a wrong analysis if we didn't take it into account?
For balcony motifs, you can define a load on the floor with the "Linear floor load" command."201968":r1zqz76m" said:Thank you for your suggestion. I have done analyzes as you said in previous projects. I shared this question for a different perspective and analysis. I would appreciate if ideCAD management also comments on this issue. Thanks
If you want to include the motif beam in the analysis model and a semi-rigid solution is being made, you can model it this way (In this case, it would be appropriate to arrange the reinforcement axis types of the cantilever flooring.) You can ignore the dimension warnings in this beam."201968":3enwsmgx" said:Mr. Levent, what I want to ask is not linear load definition, would it be wrong to solve the motifs whose dimensions are 20/30 as 20/30 beams?
Since the right side of the D02 slab is beam, the reinforcement axis of the reinforcement axis no. 1 is console type console It is appropriate to set it as console reinforcement or top+bottom flat reinforcement with the "Reinforced Concrete Calculation Axis Edit" command."201968":1obze0jx" said:''In this case, it would be appropriate to arrange the reinforcement axle types of the console slab'' Mr. Levent, can you explain what you mean here