Back-of-console distribution accessories are plotted in the wrong place

Re: There is an error in the retaining wall. Hello, there is no error in the writing and drawing of the Front and Back side distribution reinforcements on the retaining wall. Min. transverse reinforcement purchase and min. The pressure is calculated depending on the reinforcement price and reinforcement spacing. Minimum cross section in default parameters (front face): 0.001 min. pressure reinforcement price (back side): 0.0015 is entered. In order to have more reinforcement on the back, "Min. transverse reinforcement allowance value", Min. You can enter more than the pressure reinforcement price. Good work
 
Re: A faulty situation in the retaining wall. We have tried it by taking the parts and reinforcement sections as equivalent.
 
Re: Faulty condition on retaining wall. hello, Min. When calculating the compression reinforcement area, the net concrete area is taken into account. This is why the front and back values in the picture you added are different. While calculating the pressure reinforcement on the front, I take note of the net concrete area. Good work
 
Re: A faulty situation on the retaining wall. Levent, if you excuse me, I have a question. Should the retaining console compression/tensile reinforcements thrust zone be moved to the middle zone, as in columns, according to tbdy2018? Good work.
 
Re: A faulty situation on the retaining wall.
"Ufukbey":3ioqvzha" said:
Levent, I have a question. Retaining console pressure/tensile reinforcements overlap area, according to tbdy2018, as in columns, middle Good work.
Click to expand...
Such a situation is not mentioned in TBDY 2018. Good work
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top