b3 disorder

T

torbalib

New Member
good work. I put a column on the beam that is connected from the column to the column. I knew that the program automatically increases the internal forces, but the municipality did not accept it.
 
Hello, The program automatically increases the loads by 50% in elements with b3 type irregularities. If there is no problem in your data entry, it is written that there is a b3 type irregularity in the earthquake code general report. In addition, in the column and beam reports for the column resting on the beam and the beams carrying the column, "B3 irregularity increased by 50%" is written in the static results section. Show the inspector these parts in the reports...
 
There should be a nodal point at the point where the column overlaps, and you can achieve this by drawing the beam in 2 stages.
 
Yes, it means there is a problem with the model, not the program. At the point where you connect the column, you should create a nodal point in the lower floor beam. First of all, I'm throwing an axle at the point where I'm going to break the column. I draw the beam in two parts and give it the same name. Then I move the axis from the bottom floor to the top and draw my column that is stuck in the beam. Thus, there is no node error. In perspective view, you can enter 3d frame mode and see if the upper floor column is connected to the lower node. Of course, the node points box must be checked in the window on the left. As in node n164 in the picture below.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top