ANALYSIS RESULTS EVERYTHING IS LOST

btemel52

New Member
WE CAN'T MATTER WITH IDE 6, I HAVE ANALYSED THE PROJECT I SENT IN THE ATTACHMENT, THE FOLLOWING THINGS HAPPENED TO ME 1-THE AXLE SYSTEM WAS ON THE GROUND FLOOR, IT WAS REGISTERED TO THE 5TH FLOOR, I mean, BUILDING TACKLE AT THE ATTITUDE 5 ATTITEBAZI WORKS ETC. FLOORING EASILY ACCOUNT ACS draw CONCLUSION We TAKE 3-ANALYSIS RESULTS FLOORING EDIT ARE BUT THE LABEL AND ACCOUNT ACS NOT SHOWN 4-THREE-DIMENSIONAL WINDOW BUILDING THREE-DIMENSIONAL APPEARANCE some cases Zommer BORDERS DE When I Disappear 5-THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODE LADDER THREE DIMENSIONS HOW MAUSER WITH hold TURN we BURDAN A WE CANNOT TURN THE BUILDING OVER BY TAKING ANY KIND OF FLIGHT MODE 6- LOOK AT THE DRAWING OF A LADDER IT LOOKS LIKE ARAB HAIR DIMENSIONAL LINES THERE ARE UNDESIRED LINES IN SECTIONS FRIENDS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN NOW
 
Hello there; I think you have created the model using the command "Read 2D architecture Project", you will say, yes, so what? If you examine the model, you will see that all of your columns are defined with very small angles and are not fully connected to the axis intersections, most of the column-beam junctions are incorrect (either not joined or combined in a way that should not be), small meaningless beam particles remain in the column in a few places, therefore almost all of the slab definitions are incorrect. ... My suggestion would be to define this project from scratch using IdeStatic modeling techniques, and then make a solution like that. I wish you good work...
 
IT'S CORRECT I USED THE 2D PROJECT AS A BASE AND IF WE DON'T DO THAT, WE WERE THINKING LIKE THE EASE OF THE 6 IN THIS IDE, BUT THE PARTS REMAINING IN THE DRAWING ARE MISLYING US BUT IF WE CAN'T USE IT EASILY, WE CAN MAKE US MORE DWGPORT OR MEMBERSHIP.
 
IdeCAD is a three-dimensionally designed program. It reads 3D data from its own architectural program and other architectural 3D programs. It also reads 2D dwg but you may need to work on it a bit.
 
If you look at the coordinates of the architectural project you are reading, you will see that it is in an unrelated place. The y coordinate of the A axis of your ground floor is -11900m, the y coordinate of the A axis of your 5th floor is -8m. After reading the DWG, move your drawing so that the bottom left of your building is roughly at the origin, then start creating your objects. You can't see it in 3D, probably because a part of your building is formed in an unrelated place. Check whether the carrier elements and the system formed at each stage are correct. In fact, if your architectural file does not create automatic elements in a very healthy way, you can even consider creating the axes and columns automatically and entering the beams manually. The idea that I'll have the program read everything automatically from the DWG and then press F9 and I'll be done is not correct, because there is no guarantee that everything will be read properly from every dwg, since there is no certain standard for dwg drawings. You should initially consider creating a system from DWG and 2D drawing as a helpful tool when creating your element coordinates and dimensions. Depending on the situation, you may need to intervene and organize your system. If you pay attention to these, I think you will work more smoothly. Copy your ladder with ctrl+c without any action, open the new project with the default black background template and paste it with ctrl+v. This way, when I get the ladder drawing, it is formed properly. Most likely, there is a problem in your staircase drawing because of the inconsistency between the project coordinates and the excessively large coordinates. Good work
 
I could not understand NUMBER OF ADMIN COUNCIL'S SO STAIR BUILDING WITHIN REMOVE AND NEW PROJECTS BY OPENING'm BOOK Insights SEPARATE from BUILDING BY to PASTE THIS FIELD AND THAT SORAYA my DRAW ALAYINA I IF YOU WANT THIS PROCESS WILL BE SATISFIED If you ONE TWO DRAWINGS A DESCRIPTION I FURTHER STEPS KONUSUB AGAIN THE STAIRS OLUŞTURMAKM BETTER RESULTS DATA OR READY LADDER TYPE ON CHANGES DO WE GET BETTER RESULTS BY DOING IT? HOW DO WE CHANGE THE THICKNESS OF STAIRS AND FLOORINGS? THANKS IN NOW
 
You can get results for this project by copy+pasting the ladder to a new project. It is not a problem to remove it from the building as the support conditions etc. are defined in the staircase. As I mentioned above, if you pay attention to the coordinates, especially when reading dwg, you will have less problems. The coordinates can be strange in this way, since the architects working on Autocad enter the building directly on the incoming land plan. In the next version, we will add the option to automatically move the lower left corner of the building to (0,0) while reading dwg. If the staircase you want to build is a slightly changed version of the ready-made stairs, it would be easier to change an existing staircase, of course. You can change the thickness of the stairs and landings from the "Parameters" section by selecting the ladder, right-clicking and entering the "properties" menu.
 
We are asked not to know the spectrum periods ta and tb values at the beginning of the project. Before the analysis, I ENTERED Z3 VALUE INSTEAD OF Z4 AGAIN What should I do to correct it? thanks
 
In order to change the situation in question, you can make Z3 Z4 if you enter the 1st Behavior Spectrum Analysis > 2. Behavior Spectrum Functions under the DSF1 exists> properties from the structure tree section on the left. I'm adding a picture for details.
 
Back
Top