Analysis difference between Version 7.016 and 6.54

G

greyfurt

New Member
Hello there ; I save the project that I did not get vertical load error in version 7.016, save it as version 6.54 and have it analyzed in that version, and it gives vertical load, shear safety error on columns and offset error on some beams. What could be the reason for this, good work project:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello, Regarding the vertical load of the column: Some changes have been made in the vertical load control of the columns between 6.54 and 7 according to the regulation. It is written in TDY 3.3.1.2 that the axial pressure force calculated under the joint effect of vertical loads and earthquake loads will be controlled with 0.5Acfck. At 6.54 the 0.5Acfck control included 1.4G+1.6Q vertical. In version 7, 1.4G+1.6Q installation has been removed from the said control. In addition to its place; 0.9Acfcd control written in TS500 has been introduced. In version 7, 1.4G+1.6Q is controlled with 0.9Acfcd, while combinations calculated under the common effect of 0.5Acfck earthquake loads are controlled. If you look at the order in the column normal force control in the column report, you can see the changes I wrote. As for some beams to give a marginal error: The secondary beams (K122 and K125) on the ground floor give a marginal error at 6.54 as 25/32. Cause: In 6.54, the contours of tiles D68 and D69 are rendered incorrectly. (Due to not entering the junction of beams K120 and K64 and K66 and K123 correctly)... In version 7, the floor contour is formed properly. If you correct the floor contour at 6.54, the beam offsets are also corrected. It has been observed that the deflection limit of the K119 beam has been exceeded: At 6.54, the clear length of the beam is 3.95. Since the beam does not meet the height requirement, it is included in the deflection calculation. In version 7, the beam clear span is calculated as it should be. (Ln=3.82). The beam recovers the deflection control condition with little value. (ln=3.82/12= 0.31 <h=32 cm) Dolayısıyla kiriş, sehim hesabına girmiyor. Kirişin sehim hesabının yükseliğe bağlı olması/olmaması ile ilgili seçeneğin kiriş ayarlarında bulunduğunu not düşeyim.

Sonuç:
1. 6.54 ile 7 arasında deprem uç kuvvetleri olarak fark görülmemiştir.
2. K120 ile K64 ve K66 ile K123 kirişlerinin birleşiminin 6.54'de doğru düzenlenmesi sonrasında düşey yükleme sonuçları da aynı çıkmaktadır.
3. Kolon düşey yük değerlendirmesi, kiriş pursantajları ve sehim hesabı ile ilgili durumlar 6.54 ile 7 arasında öngörülen değişiklikler sonucunda oluşmaktadır.

Projenizde oluşan diğer problemler 6.54 - 7 versiyonunda aynıdır. Projenize ait son notlarımızı, açtığınız diğer forum başlığından takip edebilirsiniz.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


İyi çalışmalar
 
Vertical load controls in 7.016 were in place, 0.5fckAc is a condition for ductile design, and for increased loads required to be used in earthquake combinations, 0.9Acfcd in TS 500 had to be checked. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top