Although I added curtains, I could not meet the tipping moment condition.

[serefteknik]

Hello ; Although I added curtains to many places in the attached project, I could not meet the overturning moment condition. Is there something missing in my settings or is it a mistake in the design? I can't find the result. Could you please check it and share your suggestions

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: overturning moment problem Hello, - In the project you added, the flooring system is slab flooring. You can choose the high ductility level and the carrier system type A15. In this case, the condition TotalMdev>0.75Mo does not need to be met. -With the approach in TBDY 2018, it has become extremely difficult to provide the condition TotalMdev>0.75 Mo. To meet this condition, it may be necessary to add curtain groups and/or tie beam (gap) curtains to the system. Some project notes; - We do not recommend marking the line "Consider the contribution of the tie beams (Nv) that do not meet the 1/3 condition in the calculation of the shear wall tipping moment" in the Analysis Settings / TBDY Options tab, in this state of the regulation. -P3-P10-P11 elevator curtains should be defined as group curtains. -There is no need to define columns at the beginning of the curtain. For example, it would be appropriate to enter curtains instead of columns S4 and S3 on the left and right of curtain P08 and model curtains as a group. (P09-S10-S9, P6-S1, P13-S2...) - It would be appropriate to define the beam k30-31 between P7-S6 columns as a single piece. -The long side of the S12 polygon column provides a 1/6 aspect ratio. It would be appropriate to enter the long and short side curtains and model them as curtain groups. For the short side that does not provide the 1/6 ratio, the "short head pitch" option can be selected from the Curtain Properties. Good work