About beamless raft foundation

batifon

New Member
PROJECT I EK SEND STAGE without girders RAFT DO I GEREKİYOR.PROJ HALF basement + ground + 4 FLOOR without girders RAFT FOUNDATION GROUND FLOOR SEPARATE in the BASEMENT SEMI OLARAKM the TANIMLAYACA I DO NOT HAVE GROUND FLOOR KOTTA VEREREKM IDENTIFICATION I NEED PROJECT EK SEVİNİRİM OLURSANIZ the GÖNDERECEM.YARDIMC NOTE: YOU GIVE you PREVIOUSLY EXAMPLE KOTTA PROVIDING YOU DID)
 
Hello, You should also adjust the column elevations (lengths) on the floor, which is the stage in the project you added. The system you entered, the curved raft plate is suitable for the design, but the level difference is quite high in the two blocks, which are still steps. You should equip the curved raft part separately. In my opinion, define each of the parts that are stages as a floor. You define the raft system on its own floors. Since the basement floor is below the ground level, you define a panel object as a subfloor between the floors. Good work...
 
"batifon":bto1gdxf" said:
IN THE PROJECT I ATTENDED, I NEED TO MAKE A GRADE WITHOUT BRAIDED. THE PROJECT HAS HALF BODRUM+GROUND+4 FLOOR UNBEAMABLE RADIUM FOUNDATION. GROUND FLOOR SEPARATE BODRUM CAN BE GROUND TEMPLE TEMPLE TEMPERATURE PRINCIPLE. I LOVE NOTE: YOU MADE IT BY GIVEN DENIM IN THE PREVIOUS EXAMPLE YOU GIVEN)
Hello, In your project, you defined the raft foundation on the ground floor and gave a (-) level in the half basement floor, in this case the columns and walls in the basement did not transfer load to the raft foundation, the raft foundation Define the basement on the basement floor, and define the foundation for the non-column part on the ground floor. Good work.
 
Hello, I have a question about this. I have done similar applications before. Does the program regarding the independent operation of the raft foundation at different elevations and the integrity of the superstructure fully take into account the superstructure interactions that may arise from different foundation settlements? Good work
 
Hello Hakan, thank you for your reply. I have one more question. I did analysis in some projects and in 6.2 version I had to go for stiffness reduction (eg 0.5 or 0.3) only for earthquake loadings for moments of inertia in order to get the same results as version 6.0101 especially for shear walls. I wonder if the program made these stiffness reductions automatically in the previous version. Because I cannot see the moments of inertia of the cracked section in the program. Thanks for your interest.
 
Hello, in version 6.2, the moment of inertia of the beams resting on the shear wall on both sides is automatically applied with 50% reduced if the option is selected. According to your need, the stiffness reduction tab can be used for other situations. If you enter the properties after entering the beam, the tab will appear...
 
Back
Top