German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish A1 If the torsional irregularity coefficient nbi is greater than 1.2, is the amplification factor Di applied to the 5% eccentricity (it is written in the equivalent earthquake load method in the regulation, but) is also used in dynamic analysis in ideStatik? Or do the internal forces and displacements indirectly increase due to the relationship given in equation 2.16 due to the growth of this coefficient? Thanks...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
About A1 Torsional Irregularity
- Thread starter proisa
- Start date
HakanŞahin
Administrator
"proisa":tsq1y6xs" said:A1 If the torsional irregularity coefficient nbi is greater than 1.2, is the amplification factor Di applied to 5% eccentricity (it is written in the equivalent earthquake load method in the regulation, but) is also used in dynamic analysis in ideStatik? Do the internal forces and displacements increase indirectly due to the correlation given in equation 2.16 due to the growth of the coefficient? Equation 2.16 is applied automatically depending on the Vt/Vtb ratio.
An additional 5% eccentricity is applied in all circumstances. I mean the equivalent that allows the earthquake loads in the modal analysis to be compared with the equivalent earthquake load method. In 2.16, it was whether BD in the equation would also change due to the increasing eccentricity due to the Di coefficient and therefore the changing Vt. thanks...