a few problems

[ssesli]

I have idestatic 7. I'm working on the project that you can see in the appendix, and I encountered a few problems. I would appreciate if you could help. I defined these by considering the example in the forum while defining the 1st sub-basement curtain. ( It does not appear in the example ) 2. In all my beams, 2 lower 2 upper 12 iron bars are visible. After that, the reinforcements do not change even though I say only 14 gauges in my beam reinforcements from the reinforcement parameters section. 3. At the beginning and at the end of the beams, there is one 12-piece addition. Instead, when I increase the lower and upper reinforcement by 1 and make 14 in size, it says the reinforcement area is insufficient. (May be related to Pursantaj). your report. Thanks in advance

 

[Levent Özpak]

I have

idestatic 7. I am working on the project that you can see in the appendix and I encountered a few problems. I would appreciate if you could help me. These are the 1. Subbasman curtain while defining the example in the forum. But floor plan - basic plan Although I click on the icon, these curtains are still visible in the floor plan.( Not visible in the example)

Hello, Sub-floor curtains are visible in both architectural and formwork plan modes. However, since these curtains are given an upper level, they will not appear on the formwork plan when the Formwork plan is taken from the Drawing Menu.

2. In the reinforcements, 2 lower 2 upper 12 iron bars are visible in all my beams. From now on, the reinforcements do not change even though I say use only 14 in my beam reinforcements from the reinforcement parameters section.

You may not have made an analysis in the project. You need to click the Analysis + Reinforced Concrete command from the Analysis menu .

3. There is 1 additional 12 at the beginning and at the end of the beams. Instead, I increase the lower and upper reinforcement by 1 each. When the size is 14, it says the reinforcement area is insufficient. (May be related to Pursantaj)

It is normal to give an AS(-) warning if the required reinforcement is not provided in any support or opening when you intervene in the beam reinforcements. In the Reinforced Concrete/Beam dialog, in the Reinforced Concrete configuration tab, you can see where the reinforcement deficiency is.

4.As I am a new user, I ask the masters to report the mistakes you have seen in the project. Thanks in advance

*The eaves slabs on the 1st floor do not have continuity with the other slabs due to the level difference. In this case, it would be appropriate to select the -This beam bears the cantilever slab- option from the properties of the beams on which the cantilever reinforcement axles of the eaves slabs sit.( For example, select the beam K08 where the cantilever reinforcement axis of the D08 slab sits. Click the Object properties command. In the dialog that opens, in the Static/Reinforced Concrete Tab, select -This beam bears the cantilever slab-.) * In the Analysis Settings Foundation/Soil Tab [ b]-Superstructure interactive solution-[/b] is recommended to be checked. (Basic rotations and displacements to TDy 2007 in C and D group soils are required to be taken into account in the superstructure.) *Again, it is recommended to select the -TS500 redistribution clause- option in the Analysis settings Load safety tab. (It can be useful in checking the Column Beam Joint safety) *Continuous foundations need to be connected to the panel objects at node points. Therefore, in the foundation system you created, TK02-03-04-05 continuous foundations are not connected to the carrier elements. Instead, it would be appropriate to design the entire system as a raft foundation or to define only the raft laying under the panels as in the example project. Good work

 

[ssesli]

Hello, Deyalı, thanks for your reply. Although I have the latest version of the file you added, the file did not open because the file is incompatible. Regarding the beams, in the calculation results, the lower and upper reinforcements are 2 pieces of 14 and there is no problem. When I convert to pieces, it gives a missing equipment error. When I look at the configuration, there is no negative field, but the As(-) error appears. The sample of the project is attached, I would appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hi, Thanks for your reply Deyalı. Even though I have the latest version, the file you added did not open because the file is incompatible. In the calculation results for beams, the upper and lower reinforcements are 2 pieces of 14 and there is no problem. but when I convert all the lower and upper reinforcements to 3 each, it gives the error of missing reinforcement. When I look at the configuration, there is no negative field, but the As(-) error is visible. The sample of the project is attached, I would be glad if you could take a look. Thanks

file was saved in version Ver 7.018. The reason why K4 and K6 beams give an AS(-) warning when you arrange and analyze the beam reinforcements in your project is the inadequacy of the body reinforcements... Body reinforcement is placed on the relevant beams in accordance with TDY 2007 article 3.4.2.5. reinforcement areas are also increasing, so it is necessary to increase the hull reinforcement.