2 basements + 5 floors hollow floor structure

[azoo]

Good work everyone, can I have your comments about the design? In addition, since the building is hollow, I still have problems with the foundation, even though I made ampatage and 80 cm thick foundation. I would be glad to receive your opinion on this matter.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Good work to everyone, can I have your comments on the design? Also, since the building is hollow, I still have problems with the ampatage and 80 cm thick foundation, even though I made a foundation with a thickness of 80 cm. I would appreciate if I get your opinions on this subject.

Hello , In your project, reinforced concrete axles pass through columns and walls, and the required reinforcement area for the upper and lower whole is desired to be met with the main reinforcement along that line.In the main reinforcement, inadequacy occurs due to the selection of reinforcement and additional spacing.In order to make more economical reinforcement design, the reinforced concrete axles are required to be covered by the column-wall It will be appropriate for you to pass through the point where there are no columns and walls. Additional reinforcements will be automatically selected for the regions where there are columns and walls.In the example data entry I added, the largest additional reinforcement appears as fi18/10 in the U-wall region and 80 cm raft is sufficient.

 

[YasinTezel]

Hello, Since the raft basic calculation axes pass under the curtain, the reinforcement area required for the main reinforcement is excessive. If you want, you can choose the reinforcement that meets this reinforcement area and solve it without additional reinforcement. But it is not economical. I took the calculation axles into the column openings. The main reinforcement area is thus reduced. Where necessary, the required reinforcement areas are met with additional reinforcements, especially under the curtain. The project is attached.

 

[NYILMAZ]

Let me give you some advice just by looking at the floor plan. (I did not examine the other floors and subjects) If I were you, I would design the continuous beams as shown in red in the attached picture. I would make the beam widths the same. I would make a continuum that steps over the columns. I would also make the outer (vertical) side beams continuously and make the rest of the constructive concrete. Although your lower horizontal beams are 25/50, the cantilever beams holding it (green revision cloud) are 50/35. Wrong combination. Cross the cantilever and corner points beam in the blue revision cloud. Do not leave the column alone and discontinuous. After all, you are using a hollow (flat ceiling) system. While this gives you the right to pass beams wherever you want, you get rid of the trouble of creating a troublesome carrier system by placing beams under the wall. N. YILMAZ

 

[azoo]

Hi, because the raft foundation calculation axes pass under the curtain, the reinforcement area required for the main reinforcement is excessive. If you want, you can choose the reinforcement that meets this reinforcement area and solve it without additional reinforcement. But it is not economical. I bought the calculation axes for the column openings The main reinforcement area has decreased in this way. The required reinforcement areas are met with additional reinforcements, especially under the curtain, where necessary. The project is attached.

Thank you Mr. Hakan and Yasin for the information you provided. I did not pay much attention to what goes on the axis of the calculation. It's good to learn.As you said, the reinforcement has decreased.

 

[azoo]

Just to give a recommendation by looking at the floor plan (I did not examine other floors and subjects) I would design the continuous beams as shown in red in the attached picture. I would make the beam widths the same. I would make a continuum stepping on the columns. I would also make the outer (vertical) side beams continuously and make the rest of them in constructive concrete. Although your lower horizontal beams are 25/50, the cantilever beams holding it (green revision cloud) are 50/35. Incorrect joint. The console and corner in the blue revision cloud Cross the points with beams. Do not leave the column alone and discontinuous. After all, you are using a hollow-ceiling (flat ceiling) system. While this gives you the right to pass beams anywhere you want, you get rid of the trouble of creating a troublesome carrier system by placing beams under the wall. N. YILMAZ

N.YILMAZ Thank you for your time, Mr. 1. I would like to make the beams (K41, K42, K43) passing in front of the elevator constantly, but inside the elevator There is not enough space left. The reason why I stuck 25x50 beams to 50x35 beams in the places you indicated in green is because, as you said, the incoming beams are 50x35 continuous. 3. (I would also make the side beams that continue outside (vertical) and make the rest of it with constructive concrete.) I couldn't quite understand what you mean here. 4. You are right about the continuity of the beams, this is an issue that bothers me. Beams can be made of the same size along the D axis. However, I thought that if I connect the columns to each other and turn beams from the outside where the protrusion is 50 cm, there will be very little flooring between the two beams, which would be too much in terms of manufacturing. I just don't want to tie the columns together and throw a console floor on his forehead and press the outer walls directly onto him. The same issue exists between the 2-7 axles on the L axis. I have one more question, I am turning 25 x 50 beams on the exterior walls of the hollow buildings and the stairs walls. In order to increase the durability of the building a little more. But I see a lot of pressure from contractors and architects to have hollow beams in these beams. I persistently do 25 x 50, but what do you think and how do you do it?

 

[evanes07]

have a nice day; When we look at the projects Hakan and Yasin took in the project in question, the valid distances of the raft calculation axes to the right and left seem a little short, do we have a chance to reduce these values in terms of regulation?

 

[YasinTezel]

Hello, We just shifted the position of the account axle. working distances remained as your project came, we did not pay attention to it. You need to arrange the working distances as in the picture. To do this, "Change the geometry of the reinforcement calculation axle." You can use the command.